Doug Ewell wrote:
> that means we don't register 200 (which we already agreed
> on), and we also don't register 830 or 833 (which are
> currently there) or 831 or 832 (which aren't).
Okay, ready to go for date-B. And afterwards, if somebody
wants them ? The tag reviewer needs a way to delay UN M.49
registration requests for some time (mabye ISO 3166-1 just
needs some time to find a new alpha-2 code), but not until
doomesday.
Bye, Frank
_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.