Frank Ellermann <nobody at xyzzy dot claranet dot de> wrote: >> that means we don't register 200 (which we already agreed >> on), and we also don't register 830 or 833 (which are >> currently there) or 831 or 832 (which aren't). > > Okay, ready to go for date-B. And afterwards, if somebody > wants them ? The tag reviewer needs a way to delay UN M.49 > registration requests for some time (mabye ISO 3166-1 just > needs some time to find a new alpha-2 code), but not until > doomesday. That's what I was saying; there needs to be a rule, or at least a really strong guideline, as to how long the Subtag Reviewer (more properly, the process) waits after the UN code is assigned. Otherwise, one person will end up thinking they have to wait a year, while another will think a week is good enough. That will attract too much controversy. -- Doug Ewell Fullerton, California http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/ _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.