How about 180 days. Mark ----- Original Message ----- From: "Doug Ewell" <dewell at adelphia.net> To: "LTRU Working Group" <ltru at ietf.org> Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 07:42 Subject: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1026] what to do about Guernsey and Jersey > Frank Ellermann <nobody at xyzzy dot claranet dot de> wrote: > > >> that means we don't register 200 (which we already agreed > >> on), and we also don't register 830 or 833 (which are > >> currently there) or 831 or 832 (which aren't). > > > > Okay, ready to go for date-B. And afterwards, if somebody > > wants them ? The tag reviewer needs a way to delay UN M.49 > > registration requests for some time (mabye ISO 3166-1 just > > needs some time to find a new alpha-2 code), but not until > > doomesday. > > That's what I was saying; there needs to be a rule, or at least a really > strong guideline, as to how long the Subtag Reviewer (more properly, the > process) waits after the UN code is assigned. Otherwise, one person > will end up thinking they have to wait a year, while another will think > a week is good enough. That will attract too much controversy. > > -- > Doug Ewell > Fullerton, California > http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ltru mailing list > Ltru at lists.ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru > > _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.