[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Ltru] Referencing the Scheme within the Tag



Huh? You mean putting a subtag into the language tag to indicate what kind (generation) of tag it is?

The 3066bis scheme represents a narrowing of the 3066 grammar for language tags. Unlike 3066, it represents a full description of every subtag, including those unassigned by 3066bis. It will not be possible to create a new, different, grammar for language tags without breaking compatibility with 3066bis. Any "3066ter" or later will essentially provide additional rules for putting things into the registry, not modify the grammar of a tag.

What will be more important to archivists will be the registry date. This will define what subtags were valid at the time. (Once we switch to a registry, the scheme itself is less important than the registry)

Putting a subtag into the tag to indicate the scheme is a colossal waste as it conveys no useful information. But I may be misunderstanding your comment, since you put the (Scheme_RFC_3066_bis) on the left side of the ABNF statement.

Best Regards,

Addison

Addison P. Phillips
Globalization Architect, Quest Software
Chair, W3C Internationalization Core Working Group

Internationalization is not a feature.
It is an architecture. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ltru-bounces at lists.ietf.org [mailto:ltru-bounces at lists.ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Debbie Garside
> Sent: den 3 juli 2005 02:59
> To: ltru at ietf.org
> Subject: [Ltru] Referencing the Scheme within the Tag
> 
> An issue that I still feel quite strongly about is the referencing of the
> encoding scheme within the language tag itself; I believe it is essential
> for long term archival processes.  I would like to propose the addition of
> the following:
> 
> "Implementers MAY reference this scheme within the language tag itself
> using
> the following syntax:
> 
> Language-Tag (Scheme_RFC_3066_bis) = ..." or some such...
> 
> This would be particularly useful when tagging cultural information for
> archival purposes e.g. digitalised manuscripts.  It would give archivists
> the ability to maintain, reference and update their systems.
> 
> 
> Debbie Garside
> www.linguasphere.com
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ltru mailing list
> Ltru at lists.ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru


_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.