Echoing DG's question (below). I see only advantage in her proposal. mg Scríobh Debbie Garside: > ... > > Okay, I see what you're saying: someone might want to retag to use new, > > more granular semantics > > Yes! Now we are getting there! > > > (hmm... like ISO 639-6, eh?). > > Well yes, if you want to look at it that way... but not just 639-6 ANY other > additions/extensions that may occur in future updates... > > What harm is there in my proposal? > > Kind regards > > Debbie -- Marion Gunn * EGTeo (Estab.1991) 27 Páirc an Fhéithlinn, Baile an Bhóthair, Co. Átha Cliath, Éire. * mgunn at egt.ie * eamonn at egt.ie * _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.