Addison Phillips <addison dot phillips at quest dot com> wrote: > 2. Keep: > > Note that previous approval of a tag under RFC 3066 is not a guarantee > of approval of a variant subtag under this document. The existing RFC > 3066 tag maintains its validity, but the original reason for its > registration might have become obsolete. OK, except I've changed "this document" to [draft-registry] for obvious reasons. > 5. Modify: > > -- > New registrations completed under RFC 3066 were entered into the ILSR > using the rules defined above. > -- > > To read: > > -- > Any additional registrations completed after adoption of [draft- > registry] using the rules in RFC 3066 will be incorporated into this > document using the rules defined above or will have appropriate > records separately submitted by the Language Subtag Reviewer according > to the rules in [draft-registry]. I assume this is supposed to replace both sentences in the paragraph. I made a minor edit to reflect that the additional registrations will be incorporated into the Language Subtag Registry, not necessarily "this document" (i.e. the *initial* registry), and I tweaked the somewhat clumsy "registrations... will have records submitted" construction. Replacing this paragraph also has the nice side effect of removing the typo "eequest." All other suggested changes seemed reasonable and were incorporated. New editor's copy is now available. -- Doug Ewell Fullerton, California http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/ _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.