[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Ltru] issue #200 is resolved (was: Re: status? last call?)



Hi -

> From: "Frank Ellermann" <nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de>
> To: <ltru at ietf.org>
> Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 1:45 AM
> Subject: [Ltru] Re: status? last call?
>

> Doug Ewell wrote:
>
> > I think it's a good idea to list the UN codes that were
> > excluded from the registry and explain why.
>
> For _valid_ UN numbers at date-B I got the idea, and that
> covers 831..833 for File-Date: 2005-07-05, even 830, tough.
>
> But not 200. the only "200" on their page belongs to 2005.
> 200 is AFAIK also no "valid candidate for registration".
> And it never was, so even a time machine wouldn't help.
...

PLEASE keep the issue number in your postings.

Randy




_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.