I'll add the additional text about private use subtags to section 4.5. In reading this thread: did anyone look at the existing section 4.5?!? Addison Addison P. Phillips Globalization Architect, Quest Software Chair, W3C Internationalization Core Working Group Internationalization is not a feature. It is an architecture. > -----Original Message----- > From: ltru-bounces at lists.ietf.org [mailto:ltru-bounces at lists.ietf.org] On > Behalf Of Doug Ewell > Sent: 2005年7月8日 23:11 > To: LTRU Working Group > Subject: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1061] eliminate (or proscribe) Private Use > Tags > > Randy Presuhn <randy underscore presuhn at mindspring dot com> wrote: > > > I can't support (2) in its current form, but could live with a > > modified version of (2) that I'll call (2a): > > > > (2) "Private-use subtags require private agreement between parties > > intending to use them. Use great caution if employing them in > > content or protocols intended for general use. Private-use subtags > > MUST conform to the format contraints specified in the ABNF. > > Private-use subtags are useless for information exchange without > > prior arrangement." > > Stop right there. That one is great; let's go with it. (Well, OK, > let's spell "constraint" correctly and then go with it.) > > -- > Doug Ewell > Fullerton, California > http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/ > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ltru mailing list > Ltru at lists.ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
_______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.