> -----Original Message----- > From: Addison Phillips [mailto:addison.phillips at quest.com] > Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2005 2:11 PM > To: Doug Ewell; LTRU Working Group > Subject: RE: [Ltru] Re: editorial nits in initial registry draft -01 > > You're not supposed to have a reference in the abstract, no? > I got beat up on that for weeks. > > Why not say: > > "This memo defines the initial contents of the Language > Subtag Registry for use in forming tags for the > identification of languages." > > The introduction can say where draft-registry is at and all that. This is better than my suggestion to mention the I-D name and adding an RFC Editor note. -Scott- _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.