Re: [Ltru] Re: editorial nits in initial registry draft -01

["Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com>]

Hi -

> From: "Scott Hollenbeck" <sah at 428cobrajet.net>
> To: "'Addison Phillips'" <addison.phillips at quest.com>; "'Doug Ewell'" <dewell at adelphia.net>; "'LTRU Working Group'"
<ltru at ietf.org>
> Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2005 3:07 PM
> Subject: RE: [Ltru] Re: editorial nits in initial registry draft -01
...
> > From: Addison Phillips [mailto:addison.phillips at quest.com]
> > Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2005 2:11 PM
> > To: Doug Ewell; LTRU Working Group
> > Subject: RE: [Ltru] Re: editorial nits in initial registry draft -01
...
> > Why not say:
> >
> > "This memo defines the initial contents of the Language
> > Subtag Registry for use in forming tags for the
> > identification of languages."
> >
> > The introduction can say where draft-registry is at and all that.
>
> This is better than my suggestion to mention the I-D name and adding an RFC
> Editor note.
...

+1

Randy




_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru