[Ltru] Frank's editorial comments on initial registry (Re: Submission: LTRU initial-registry draft-02)

["Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com>]

Hi -

Are there any objections to accepting Frank's editorial comments
on the initial registry draft -02?  None of these would require extending
the last call.

Randy, ltru co-chair

> From: "Frank Ellermann" <nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de>
> To: <ltru at ietf.org>
> Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 2:27 AM
> Subject: [Ltru] Re: Submission: LTRU initial-registry draft-02
>

> Doug Ewell wrote:
>
> > "draft-ietf-ltru-initial-02", in text format.
>
> |  3.  UN numeric code elements assigned to "macro-geographical
> |      (continental)" as of the date of adoption of
> [...]
>
> Just to prove that I've read it, maybe s/as of/regions as of/
>
> In point six you say "These code elements are listed in Section
> 4, indicating that they are valid for registration" etc.  This
> part belongs to your point five.
>
> Section 4 does not contain any "withdrawn, vacated, deprecated,
> or otherwise judged by the LTRU working group as questionable"
> items.  Actually there were no items "judged as questionable" -
> you just followed the rules skipping all deprecated items.  New
> wording:
>
>  5.  The UN numeric code elements for countries or areas not
>      associated with an assigned [ISO3166-1] alpha-2 code
>      element were not added to the ILSR.  These values
> +    are listed in Section 4 and
>      may be requested for registration by individuals using the
>      process defined in [I-D.ietf-ltru-registry] and according
>      to the rules described therein.
> +    Listing of these code elements in this section is not a
> +    guarantee of future registration.
>
>
>  6.  Items withdrawn, vacated, deprecated,
> +    or modified
> -    modified, or otherwise judged by the LTRU working group
> -    to be questionable
>      were not added to the ILSR.
> -    These code elements are listed in Section 4, indicating
> -    that they are valid for registration using the process in
> -    [I-D.ietf-ltru-registry] but were not included initially.
> -    Listing of these code elements in this section is not a
> -    guarantee of future registration.
>
> Otherwise that I-D should be ready - I didn't check all tags
> again assuming that you'd tell us if you did something more
> interesting than replacing some dates by 2005-07-10.
>
> All references are in fact referenced.  <IANAL> No copyright
> problems, "not a mirror" is nice </IANAL>.   No 2119 keywords.
> Longest line length 72.  Exactly two folded lines, both okay:
>
>    Description: Interlingua (International Auxiliary Language
>      Association)
>    Description: Minnan, Hokkien, Amoy, Taiwanese, Southern Min, Southern
>      Fujian, Hoklo, Southern Fukien, Ho-lo
>
> No problems found, and now I don't want to hear 830, 831, 832,
> or 833 again for the rest of this year (sorry GG, IM, JE, we
> really did our best, please talk with your Duke).  Bye, Frank
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ltru mailing list
> Ltru at lists.ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru




_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru