Doug Ewell wrote:
> to be honest, I don't know what the word "modified" is doing
> there.
Nor do I, I just copied it from draft -02, if it's unnecessary
let's get rid of it:
> I would prefer: "Code elements that were withdrawn, vacated,
> or deprecated from [UN-M.49] as of the date of adoption of
> [I-D.ietf-ltru-registry] were not added to the ILSR."
That's okay. It's one of our axioms that the UN numbers are
never "modified" - unless "the same piece of uknow" picks a
new name, then that name can be modified.
Bye, Frank
_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.