[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1061] eliminate (or proscribe) Private Use Tags



At 22:00 09/07/2005, Doug Ewell wrote:
In the interest of achieving consensus, I won't argue further about the
exact wording of this section.  I do insist that private-use tags and
subtags in "x-" not be removed from the grammar, or proscribed entirely.
It MUST be legal for consenting adults to generate and interpret
"x-this" and "en-x-that" in the privacy of their homes.

I think confusion exists here. No one has ever considered that x-tags were to be associated to adult extentions of a language. To the countrary one of the applications of the x-tags in the "en" context you quote is precisely to be able to use tags of the form of "en-x-kids" that could be made mandatory for partental protection on "kid.us" namespace for example.

If there is a confusion by a common US reader here, I recommand that some examples are provided for further user guidance.
jfc


_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.