[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltru] Re: Adding more 2119 keywords



On 04:46 13/07/2005, Frank Ellermann said:
John.Cowan wrote:
 > when I posted that, I didn't yet know we were in last-call
> status.

Randy posted it in
<http://mid.gmane.org/001001c585ed%245b049ee0%247f1afea9 at oemcomputer>

I just found the "secret script" for this part of the process:

MUST and SHOULD:

ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf-online-proceedings/05mar/proceedings/slides/wgchair-0/sld32.htm
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf-online-proceedings/05mar/proceedings/slides/wgchair-0/sld33.htm

WG Last Call

ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf-online-proceedings/05mar/proceedings/slides/wgchair-0/sld35.htm
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf-online-proceedings/05mar/proceedings/slides/wgchair-0/sld36.htm

So we are at step 35 of 50, that's only 70% ;-)  Bye, Frank

Frank,
as you may note:

"Document must be reviewed and actively supported by a significant number of people, including experts in all applicable areas ... or it should not be sent to the IESG. Silent does not mean consent during this phase". I do not think this is fully matched up to now. I accept there are experts in this WG on various applicable parts, and that I am one of them, focusing on OPES, DNS, IDN, ccTLDs, Common of Reference Centers, but there are certainly many other areas. A list would be useful. And I do not support the Document in its present form as a replacement of RFC 3066 but I accept it with comments as a complement of RFC 3066. Otherwise the we are to do is to review all the RFC quoting RFC 3066 and proactively making sure they are not adversely affected. Both is in theory and in the way they are used.

"Document should be extensively reviewed both within the WG and across other areas". Due to the difference of point of view and the lack of common evaluation of the Charter, I consider myself as one of the "other areas". I will try as indicated before to provide a review before having to go on vacations.

But I am certainly disappointed by the lack of Charter clean sheet study (cf. ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf-online-proceedings/05mar/proceedings/slides/wgchair-0/sld24.htm )

I strongly recommand to consider this:
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf-online-proceedings/05mar/proceedings/slides/wgchair-0/sld23.htm

jfc


_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.