[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Ltru] Re: "x" doesn't "mean" anything

From: Frank Ellermann <nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de>
To: ltru at ietf.org
Cc:
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 02:59:50 +0200

Randy Presuhn wrote:

> Can I get a hum on whether to add the proposed text?

What's the opposite of "hum" ?  Whatever it might be,
please assume that I've done it.  Bye, Frank


_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Ltru] Re: "x" doesn't "mean" anything
  - From: Martin Duerst

Prev by Date: [Ltru] Re: Introduction change: suggested text
Next by Date: Re: [Ltru] "x" doesn't "mean" anything (was: [psg.com #1061] eliminate(or proscribe) Private UseTags)
Previous by thread: [Ltru] Re: Introduction change: suggested text
Next by thread: Re: [Ltru] Re: "x" doesn't "mean" anything
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.