RE: [Ltru] Introduction change: suggested text

["Peter Constable" <petercon at microsoft.com>]

> From: ltru-bounces at lists.ietf.org [mailto:ltru-bounces at lists.ietf.org]
On
> Behalf Of Misha Wolf
> Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 6:08 AM
> To: ltru at ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [Ltru] Introduction change: suggested text
> 
> I suggest that we declare victory and go home.

I agree. Word-smithing by committee can always continue to fill whatever
time is available, and I don't think we're making any really significant
changes. Rather, we're examining a level of subtlety in our readings of
the text that will not be noticed by readers in general. 

If we make it clear that programming languages are excluded, I doubt the
registration process will have difficulty rejecting a tag that treated
bridge signaling and terminology as a separate language. (Last I knew,
"three spades", "ruff" etc. were English expressions.)



Peter Constable

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru