Re: [Ltru] Last Call Comment: draft-ietf-ltru-initial-02.txt

["Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com>]

Hi -

> From: "Scott Hollenbeck" <sah at 428cobrajet.net>
> To: "'LTRU Working Group'" <ltru at ietf.org>
> Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 7:18 AM
> Subject: [Ltru] Last Call Comment: draft-ietf-ltru-initial-02.txt
>

> Section 2 of draft-ietf-ltru-initial-02.txt describes the criteria used to
> populate the registry.  Section 4 describes omitted code elements.  I don't
> see any text to explain *why* the code elements in section 4 were omitted.
> Which criteria were not met?.  It might be helpful to provide a few
> sentences to summarize the rationale for the WG's omission decision for the
> benefit of readers who weren't part of the on-list discussion.
...

Currently, section 4 starts out with:
   The following code elements from [UN-M.49] were not assigned as
   subtags in the initial Language Subtag Registry, but are valid
   candidates for registration as region subtags, using the process in
   [I-D.ietf-ltru-registry]:

Here are some suggested replacement words:
   The following code elements from [UN-M.49] were not associated
   with [ISO3166-1] alpha-2 code elements.  Consequently, they were
   not assigned as
   subtags in the initial Language Subtag Registry, but are valid
   candidates for registration as region subtags, using the process in
   [I-D.ietf-ltru-registry]:

Would this address your concern?

Randy




_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru