RFC 3066 does not permit what you desire (dots or long subtags) under any reading you can possibly imagine. Addison Addison P. Phillips Globalization Architect, Quest Software Chair, W3C Internationalization Core Working Group Internationalization is not a feature. It is an architecture. > -----Original Message----- > From: ltru-bounces at lists.ietf.org [mailto:ltru-bounces at lists.ietf.org] On > Behalf Of r&d afrac > Sent: 2005?7?14? 19:29 > To: Randy Presuhn; LTRU Working Group > Subject: Re: [Ltru] Re: Compatibilities > > At 03:06 15/07/2005, Randy Presuhn wrote: > >Hi Jefsey - > >If you disagree with the material on compatibility (which has been in the > >i-d in various forms for a *long* time), > > I know, Addison claimed that. > > >then it is up to you to propose text. > > You want me to add text to remove all the added text??? > You should know now that the best compatibility I advise is to stay with > RFC 3066 and its lose application. > What also permits the addition of the Draft. > > Have a good night! > jfc > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ltru mailing list > Ltru at lists.ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.