Randy Presuhn <randy underscore presuhn at mindspring dot com> wrote: >> "This document establishes an independent registry. This registry is >> not intended to be related to any registry, database or content not >> documented in this document." > > We're in second working group last call. Jefsey has kindly provided > specific text he would like added to the initial registry draft, which > is planned to be submitted for consideration for publication as an > Informational RFC. Does the WG believe that this addition is > technically necessary? This is like making a statement, when I get into my car, that I am only getting into my own car and not anyone else's. Additionally, the word "content" makes me wonder if there is more to this text than meets the eye. Tags that are conformant to RFC 3066bis are composed of subtags defined in the registry, and are indeed related to other content -- the written, spoken, or other natural-language content being tagged as to language and variant. The proposed text could be interpreted to mean that the IANA Language Subtag Registry has no meaning or significance. I do not support adding this text to any of the three WG documents. -- Doug Ewell Fullerton, California http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/ _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.