r&d afrac scripsit:
> I only long clear, stable, efficient, scalable IETF tags we all can use in
> peace. This is a legitimate demand I will repeat again and again until I
> get them: this is what the IETF is about.
This is a clear statement of the author's intent to spam this mailing
list and other IETF mailing lists until he gets his way. It should be
obvious to all that this will never happen.
Since there is at least a good possibility that this WG will continue
for some time, through the matching draft, RFC 3066ter (ISO 639-3), and
perhaps even quater (ISO 639-6), I see no reason at all why we should
continue to put up with this treatment.
I call for an immediate warning under BCP 94, to be followed by suspension
under BCP 94 and if necessary under BCP 83 as well.
--
John Cowan cowan at ccil.org www.reutershealth.com www.ccil.org/~cowan
The known is finite, the unknown infinite; intellectually we stand
on an islet in the midst of an illimitable ocean of inexplicability.
Our business in every generation is to reclaim a little more land,
to add something to the extent and the solidity of our possessions.
--Thomas Henry Huxley
_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.