[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Ltru] Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents



> From: ltru-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:ltru-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf
Of r&d afrac


> The problem with your Draft is that you do not include the 3 letters
> version of the 2 letter version as a correlative information between
> ISO 639-2 and ISO 639-3 tables. I do not think should be left to the
> Editor.

I think it is out of scope for this registry to document equivalences
between alternate standardized codes, whether that be equivalences
between the 639-1 alpha-2 code and the 639-2 alpha-3 code, the 3166-1
alpha-2 code and the 3166-1 alpha-3 code, or whatever.



Peter Constable

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.