[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Ltru] Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initializationdocuments



Addison Phillips wrote:

> This thread strikes me as irrelevant.

Minimally it's one working model for 3066ter.

> What the RFC Editor does later is not our problem

I'm not sure about that.  If we adopt John's proposal
chapter 3 in "initial" could be moved to an appendix A,
with a note to replace it before publication (= after
the creation of the registry) by "X", where "X" is
essentially the URL of the registry.

> we'll be looking at the IANA registry by then.

In theory.  In practice what I have on my box as path
I:\DOKU\RFC\*.txt is a CD ROM with RfCs and similar
texts up to RfC 3195.

With John's proposal we'd be sure that the initial
registry doesn't make it into any "RfC collections"
reflecting a then obsolete state of the real thing.

IMO John's procedural idea is better.  Bye, Frank



_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.