Hi - > From: "Frank Ellermann" <nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de> > To: <ltru at ietf.org> > Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 11:25 AM > Subject: [Ltru] Re: [psg.com #1135] IETF/LC something other than BCP? ... > and so the state > "waiting for AD go-ahead" substate "revised ID needed" could > be used to ... > 4) add a dummy link to the registry, > 5) add a RfC-editor note to remove appendix A and to fix this > dummy link as soon as the real IANA registry is available. ... Let's see what Doug proposes for the note. I'd personally prefer a reference to the registry draft, rather than putting an URL into the note in the initial registry draft. That would leave fewer opportunities for error in AUTH48. Randy _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.