[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Ltru] Re: record jar reference



Here is the change I put in for this in the body of the text:

--
<t>The registry is in a modified record-jar format text file <xref target="record-jar"></xref>. Lines are limited to 72 characters, including all whitespace.</t>

<t>Records are separated by lines containing only the sequence "%%" (%x25.25).</t>
--

I changed it to read:

--
<t>The registry is in the text format described below. This format was based on the record-jar format described in <xref target="record-jar"></xref>. </t>

<t>Each line of text is limited to 72 characters, including all whitespace. Records are separated by lines containing only the sequence "%%" (%x25.25).</t>
--

Addison

Addison P. Phillips
Globalization Architect, Quest Software
Chair, W3C Internationalization Core Working Group

Internationalization is not a feature.
It is an architecture. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ltru-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:ltru-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Frank Ellermann
> Sent: 2005?9?21? 16:52
> To: ltru at ietf.org
> Subject: [Ltru] Re: record jar reference
> 
> Addison Phillips wrote:
> 
> > I'm still making sure that Randy's brain and mine are in
> > sync, then I'll post (with diffs).
> 
> You probably are, "minimal changes" sounds like a good plan.
> 
> One point where it could go wrong is if "initial" would point
> to "registry" for the real registry, while "registry" still
> points to "initial" for the same thing.
> 
> And I somehow expect that the UN pages will delete 830 and/or
> 3166-1 will list GG+JE+IM precisely five minutes before the
> end of your "AUTH48".
>                           Bye, Frank
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ltru mailing list
> Ltru at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.