Me too. Addison Phillips wrote:
Sounds fine to me.Addison Addison P. Phillips Globalization Architect, Quest Software Chair, W3C Internationalization Core Working Group Internationalization is not a feature.It is an architecture.-----Original Message----- From: Doug Ewell [mailto:dewell at adelphia.net] Sent: samedi 24 septembre 2005 18:44 To: LTRU Working Group Cc: Addison Phillips; John C Klensin Subject: Re: [Ltru] Re: Note to RFC editor in initial registry Addison Phillips <addison dot phillips at quest dot com> wrote:In any case, you don't need to adopt John Klensin's exact words. It seems to me that he was unaware of some of the details of registration and proposed text that seemed fitting. I would suggest that you just modify the proposed wording and we move along. How about: -- 3. The initial set of subtags in the registry, which were specified by this document, are those records in the IANA registry [IANA- registry] with "Added" field-values before 2005-07-11. Note that [ltru-registry, Section 3.1] requires that an "Added" field appear in each registration record and that Section 3.3(1) specifies that field must not be changed after registration. (Other fields in these records may have been modified at a later date, subject to the restrictions in Section 3.4 of [ltru-registry].) -- NB> the date 2005-07-11 is "Date B + 1"That's OK with me, except I'm still worried about explicitly specifying the date. That gives us (or the RFC Editor) one more opportunity to forget to update "all" the dates. How about: ... with "Added" field values no later than the date of publication of this document. This assumes that the File-Date and Added dates for subtags (not grandfathered or redundant tags) in the initial registry, the date of publication of draft-initial, and the date of publication of draft-registry are all the same. I think we have been making that assumption all along, and need to be able to rely on it. I would also remove the parentheses from the last sentence, to avoid de-emphasizing it -- because I think it is important -- and append something like: Because of this, it may not be possible to use a future version of the Language Subtag Registry to reconstruct an exact copy of the initial registry contents. Comments? -- Doug Ewell Fullerton, California http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
_______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.