[Ltru] Public RFC 3934 warning to Jefsey

["Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn at mindspring.com>]

Hi Jefsey -

The ltru working group already reached a consensus on issue #1127,
on the tagging of multilingual content.  Peter is correct that negotiation
mechanisms are beyond the scope of this working group, as are the
choices made by specific protocols or file formats for the association
of language tags with content.

>From an off-list discussion, I know that you've already been given an
example of how one protocol would tag that video.  Martin wrote in
response to your off-list question:

| Even more, some protocols (such as HTTP used to serve the
| video in question) can easily carry more than one language.
| In the specific case in question, it could have come
| served with
|
| Content-Type: video/mpeg
| Content-Language: fr, en

Rehashing a closed issue, particularly on a document which has already
finished IETF last call, without the introduction of substantively new
rationale or operational experience, is, in the judgment of this co-chair,
disruptive behaviour per RFC 3934.  Such behaviour wastes the working
group's time, which would be better spent on completing the matching
draft.

If you persist in this or other disruptive behaviour on the ltru working group
mailing list, your posting privileges to ltru at ietf.org will be suspended for
a period of 30 days.

Randy, ltru co-chair

> From: "r&d afrac" <rd at afrac.org>
> To: "Peter Constable" <petercon at microsoft.com>; "LTRU Working Group" <ltru at ietf.org>
> Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 10:51 AM
> Subject: RE: [Ltru] el truth?
>
> Dear Peter,
> thank you for your ... lack of response:
>
> At 18:26 26/09/2005, Peter Constable wrote:
> >There is no difficulty whatsoever creating language tags appropriate for
> >this file. The only issues have to do with the metadata categories used
> >for content in a given application context and negotiation mechanisms
> >that make reference to those categories -- all of which is beyond the
> >scope of the current projects of this WG.
>
> please be _specific_.
>
> There is a file. There is a tagging to associate. This file is signed
> by a French prestigious language school and has be prepared by
> students from the quoted countries, let assume it is intended for
> their fellow students.
>
> What IS the full tagging to associate to this file?
>
> This file is touring the world right now as people love it. This is a
> unique occasion to clarify your proposition: I will give your tagging
> and ours so people can understand the difference (our will probably
> be didactic and something like 0-langroot.org:fraparfun, once the
> site has started - but the DRS will take time to be specified and deploy).
> jfc
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ltru mailing list
> Ltru at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru




_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru