[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Ltru] Re: ABNF typo (Was: News flash)

From: Frank Ellermann <nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de>
To: ltru at ietf.org
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 09:36:34 +0200
References: <20050922160912.KKYO5972.edge6.adelphia.net at megatron.ietf.org><006101c5c178$904c8f60$030aa8c0 at DEWELL><433674CC.78BC at xyzzy.claranet.de> <434DA42A.42F8 at xyzzy.claranet.de> <434DF34E.1734 at xyzzy.claranet.de> <001c01c5cfbc$1e935320$7f1afea9 at oemcomputer>

Randy Presuhn wrote:

> I assume the WG would have no objections to fixing this typo.

I'd guess so, but to get rid of the DISCUSS we probably need a
-14, a promise to fix it in AUTH48 can't be good enough for an
ABNF error.  Stupid... I should have known this, it was the 
same issue with SPF, but there we somehow managed to fix the
last ABNF typo virtually minutes before the final submission.

                         Bye, Frank



_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru

References:
- [Ltru] Re: record jar reference
  - From: Doug Ewell
- [Ltru] Re: record jar reference
  - From: Frank Ellermann
- [Ltru] News flash (was: record jar reference)
  - From: Frank Ellermann
- [Ltru] Re: News flash
  - From: Frank Ellermann
- [Ltru] ABNF typo (Was: News flash)
  - From: Randy Presuhn

Prev by Date: [Ltru] ABNF typo (Was: News flash)
Next by Date: Re: [Ltru] Conference on Language Standards
Previous by thread: [Ltru] ABNF typo (Was: News flash)
Next by thread: RE: [Ltru] Re: record jar reference
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.