[Ltru] Filtering coverture pending topics

[Jefsey Morfin <jefsey at online.fr>]

Dear Scott,
full agreement: it would be good if we could concentrate on WG-ltru topics.
This is a short list of basic concerns I have expressed concerning 
the filtering issues.

The reason why a langtag is not the expected one and may call for filtering:
- user does not know the language
- the machine does not support the language - the locale must adapt,
  - the construct of the locale is then of importance (not the same 
constraints/possibility as a user)
  - study of LDML might help?
  the Charter relation RFC 3066 bis/CLDR applies:
  - what is special about it?
  - why does it prevent other solutions (RFC 4151, ISO 11179, open 
to other SSDOs)
  - we do not know the IPRs of CLDR/LDML. We need to be sure it will 
be a stable proposition before committing to it.
- there is a concept error in RFC 3066 bis:
  - it lead to another langtag - for example RFC 4151 conformant
  - the used langtag has been refused by the IANA advisers.
- there is a new metastructural issue, due to a lingual TLD.

These points must be addressed either specifically (my proposition) 
or in security or usage considerations (probable fall back of the 
author from my acquired experience).
jfc


_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru