What I was referring to is the text:
[Definition:] language represents formal natural language
identifiers, as defined by [RFC 3066]or its successor(s) in the
IETF Standards Track.
Is that correct?
Misha
-----Original Message-----
From: ltru-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:ltru-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Frank Ellermann
Sent: 18 January 2006 16:47
To: ltru at ietf.org
Subject: [Ltru] Re: Language in XML Schema 1.1 Datatypes
Misha Wolf wrote:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xmlschema11-2-20060116/#language
About 1 MB, sigh.
> Is that correct?
It's the general 3066 syntax, which is a superset of the more
elaborated 3066bis syntax. Ignoring all details for certain
kinds of subtags it's still fine for all 3066bis language tags.
Bye, Frank
To find out more about Reuters visit www.about.reuters.com
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Reuters Ltd.
_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.