[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltru] Re: Language in XML Schema 1.1 Datatypes



On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 01:08:36 +0900, Misha Wolf <Misha.Wolf at reuters.com> wrote:

Looks good to me.  Thanks.

Now we need a volunteer to propose it to the XML Schema WG.

I can (and will) do that. As Addison knows, that is part of my job :)

Felix


Misha

-----Original Message-----
From: Addison Phillips [mailto:addison at yahoo-inc.com]
Sent: 23 January 2006 15:47
To: Misha Wolf
Cc: ltru at ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Ltru] Re: Language in XML Schema 1.1 Datatypes

Hello Misha,

Reference BCP 47. That's what I believe the TAG eventually decided. I
know
it is what some specs are starting to use. For example, SVG 1.2 Tiny
contains this reference:

--
[BCP 47]
    IETF BCP 47, currently represented by RFC 3066 "Tags for the
Identification of Languages", H. Alvestrand, January 2001
    Available at http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3066.txt.
--

I like that boilerplate formulation a lot.

Addison


To find out more about Reuters visit www.about.reuters.com

Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Reuters Ltd.


_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru



_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.