I have added a sentence to the charter, as follows: >>>> The working group will also consider how the draft work on ISO 639-6 may relate to the future development of language tags. >>>> This is much shorter than the proposal below, but in my judgement says just about the same. Regards, Martin. At 01:34 06/07/28, Mark Davis wrote: >I agree with that approach, but the last bit needs to be even more tentative, something like: > >The working group should also consider ISO 639-6 and whether or how that evolving work might relate to the future development of language tags. Because this work is not mature and may not be suitable for inclusion, it might not appear in the document produced by this working group. > >Mark #-#-# Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University #-#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.