[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltru] Charter update proposal (updated)



At 03:52 06/08/05, John Cowan wrote:
>Martin Duerst scripsit:
>
>> September 2006   Submit first WG draft of registry procedure update
>> September 2006   Submit first WG draft of registry data update
>> 
>> January   2007   Submit registry procedure update draft for IETF Last Call
>> January   2007   Submit registry data update draft for IETF Last Call
>
>Hmm.  Are we likely to end up with an RFC that is superseded *before*
>it is published?  And has that ever happened before?

It's up to us, and the RFC Editor. If it happens, it would reflect
good on us, but bad on the RFC Editor. What we have to think about
now is whether these milestones are realistic for us, independent
of what the RFC Editor might do or not do.

Regards,    Martin.




#-#-#  Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-#-#  http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp       mailto:duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp     


_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru


Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.