Martin Duerst wrote: >> We also need more procedural experience with the rules as >> they are. > The idea of the current recharter proposal is to use whatever > procedural experience we have, and make whatever adjustments > we think are necessary based on this, rather than to wait > until we have enough experience so that we can create the > final, perfect procedures. Are you trying to say that this > should be changed? If there will be some months with pure 3066bis rules (after it got its number), and no doubt about it, that will be good enough to see how it works. No 3066ter "last call" this year, let alone before 3066bis got its number. > I don't think we need to discuss specific adjustments to > procedures now, because we don't plan to mention them in > the charter. Are you disagreeing with this? No - just no overzealous milestones and timetable please, Frank _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.