> From: John Cowan [mailto:cowan at ccil.org] > And according to http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/codechanges.html , > there have been 68 code elements added to 639-2 in the same period, > a growth rate of 2.9%. So I'd say that it's unlikely that updates will > be proportional to the number of code elements. OK, I just wrote that I'd expect a proportional increase, but I forgot about one factor: there have been a lot of changes in 639-2 precisely because it was a limited list that has been missing things that people needed, and that is *far* less likely to be the case for 639-3. I'd still expect some increase in the number of annual changes, but I guess not an order-of-magnitude increase -- i.e. not proportionally greater. Peter Constable _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.