Hello Frank, It may not have been your fault that at some point, the other mailing list (ima at ietf.org) that I originally cross-posted got lost. But the mail below, apart from being cryptic except for people who have remembering RFC numbers as a hobby, is all about email and nothing about language codes, so the LTRU list is definitely the wrong list to post to. Regards, Martin. At 11:50 06/08/24, Frank Ellermann wrote: >Ned Freed wrote: > >> Now that NOTARY is at draft, it's probably time to drag RFC >> 2034 forward as well. Any objections? > >No, what does it take, an implementation report ? Almost an >erratum for RFC 4408, where it references RFC 3464 it should >also reference RFC 3463 and RFC 2034 - the section mentioning >5.7.1 is written from the server's POV. If you need a note >about this from someone who claims to know what RFC 4408 is I >can do. Maybe fup2 the SMTP list. > >Frank > > > >_______________________________________________ >Ltru mailing list >Ltru at ietf.org >https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru #-#-# Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University #-#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.