[moving to LTRU] > From: John Cowan [mailto:cowan at ccil.org] > > our protocols. (Which is exactly the same thing I'd say wrt the 639-1 > > "freeze": we don't need any guarantees from the JAC about new alpha-2 > > IDs; we can simply decide that we will not allow use any new alpha-2 > > IDs from this point forward.) > > At the moment, we have no such option: if the various RAs and MAs add > a new code element, we MUST add it to the registry. The most we can > do is deprecate it on the spot. > > If we want to add the option to reject (and I'd be nervous about it -- > this list could in future be captured by Not Invented Here bigots), > we need to add it to 3066ter. I suggested it for 3066bis, but either most weren't interested or the focus was on other issues at the time. Peter Constable _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.