Doug Ewell scripsit: > Martin Hosken <martin underscore hosken at sil dot org> wrote: > > >My understanding of RFC 4646 is that extensions like intlphon need to > >be registered *per language*. There seems to be no concept of script > >extensions. So either we have to hide it behind a chr-Lphn-t-ipa-phn > >(ipa phonemic) or do something else? But I may have misread the RFC. > > Extensions do not have to be language-specific AFAICT. I think Martin means variants rather than extensions. -- John Cowan http://ccil.org/~cowan cowan at ccil.org Mr. Henry James writes fiction as if it were a painful duty. --Oscar Wilde _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.