[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA



The solution proposed by Martin Hosken seems to make quite a bit
of sense to me. I only see two problems:
- This would need a change to the RFC 4646 ABNF. This is serious.
- Everything related to lanuguage tags is case-insensitive. The
  proposal below contains some case rules; these should (and can
  easily) be dropped.

Regards,     Martin.

At 15:14 06/09/15, Martin Hosken wrote:
>I would like to offer a possible solution for people to consider/laugh
>at/whatever.
>
>I suggest that we introduce the concept of a script variant that
>modifies a script subtag, that is valid for all languages and is only
>scoped by the script it occurs following. The subtag shall be 4
>characters long and start with an initial capital letter just like an
>existing script subtag. Given the space within ISO 15924 I'm sure we can
>come to some agreement over carving out a codespace for such variants.
>Failing that we could make the variant start and finish with a capital
>letter or use any capitalisation trick we feel like using to mark this
>thing. Since it is exactly 4 chars long it looks like a script tag to
>existing mechanisms (although if they are hyper strict they will get fed
>up) and would occur before the region subtag and after the script tag.
>They would be clearly identifiable since they are neither the right size
>for a region subtag or a variant subtag.
>
>The effect would be to add a mechanism of script variation that would
>take priority over regions, be clearly identifiable and would resolve
>many of the frustrations over ISO 15924.
>
>I hasten to add that I am *not* suggesting this as a solution to the
>transcription extensions issue, which I agree should be handled via an
>extension. I *am* suggesting it as a solution to the scripts question
>where a particular script variant may occur across many languages and is
>identifiably different in some key respect (here unspecified) to the
>script it is varying from.
>
>Thank you for your consideration.
>
>Yours,
>Martin Hosken
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Ltru mailing list
>Ltru at ietf.org
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru


#-#-#  Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-#-#  http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp       mailto:duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp     


_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.