[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Ltru] Re: Registry Format (was UTF-8)



On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 11:09:29PM -0700,
 Doug Ewell <dewell at adelphia.net> wrote 
 a message of 29 lines which said:

> The multiple-value problem (for example, Description) is one reason we 
> abandoned the bar-delimited format.  We would have had to choose one 
> ISO-provided description and ignore the rest:
> 
> language | es | Spanish | 2005-10-16 | Latn | |
> 
> or else use a subfield delimiter and pray it never appeared in real 
> descriptions:
> 
> language | es | Spanish; Castilian | 2005-10-16 | Latn | |

Or escape it, which is better than praying :-)

Do note that, if you don't require round-trip perfection, non-escaping
is perfectly valid, for instance:

language | nv | Navajo / Navaho | 2005-10-16 |

cannot be translated back to the record-jar registry (if / appears
somewhere) but it may be a non-issue.

_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.