Doug Ewell scripsit: > Does it? The Preferred-Values for the others are explicitly listed to > show how the tags were mapped. The judgment of the WG is involved, > although I think in these cases it will be unassailable. In the case of > "zh-min" the judgment of the WG is that (a) the tag is deprecated > because it doesn't refer to a real language and (b) there is no > Preferred-Value because no alternative tagging possibility exists for > this non-language. It's a language collection in any case, encompassing 'mnp', 'cdo', 'nan', and 'czo', and therefore should be deprecated for the same reasons as the 639-2 collection subtags. -- Normally I can handle panic attacks on my own; John Cowan <cowan at ccil.org> but panic is, at the moment, a way of life. http://www.ccil.org/~cowan _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.