[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ltru] RFC 4646 production "grandfathered" considered harmful



[chair hat on]
I have seen at least four people approving the idea to list
grandfathered/irregular tags explicitly, and nobody opposed.
I think that in principle, we seem to have consensus to go this
way, although some details may need to be worked out (see below).
If anybody disagrees with this assessment, please state so soon.


[chair hat off]
I clearly thing that it is a bad idea to include somebody's name
in a nonterminal of an ABNF. This is true both in general and also
in this specific case. When Michael proposed and approved the
tags listed below, they were not in any way illegal or irregular.

Regards,    Martin.

At 07:08 06/09/18, Mark Davis wrote:
>I do as well. Note that the BNF provides both checks of well-formedness (partial, because of repeating extensions), but also a division into semantic units. So we'd have to do something like:
>
>
>grandfathered = irregular 
>
>            / 1*3ALPHA 1*2("-" (2*8alphanum)) ; registered grandfathered codes that are well-formed, but would not otherwise be valid
>
>irregular = "en-GB-oed" / "i-ami" / "i-bnn" / "i-default" 
>           / "i-enochian" / "i-hak" / "i-klingon" / "i-lux" / "i-mingo"
>           / "i-navajo" / "i-pwn" / "i-tao" / "i-tay" / "i-tsu" 
>           / "sgn-BE-fr" / "sgn-BE-nl" / "sgn-CH-de"
>
>We could also break them down into other divisions ;-)
>
>
>grandfathered = "i-" irregular
>            / irregularEverson
>
>            / 1*3ALPHA 1*2("-" (2*8alphanum)) ; registered grandfathered codes that are well-formed, but would not otherwise be valid
>irregulari = "ami" / "bnn" / "default" / "enochian" / "hak" / "klingon" / "lux" / "mingo" / "navajo" / "pwn" / "tao" / "tay" / "tsu" 
>irregularEverson = "en-GB-oed" / "sgn-BE-fr" / "sgn-BE-nl" / "sgn-CH-de"
>Mark


#-#-#  Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-#-#  http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp       mailto:duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp     


_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.