Frank Ellermann scripsit: > Splitting i-anything from the rest is fine, IMO unnecessary to > enumerate them in the ABNF: Any decent parser could handle > x-anything, it should be also able to handle i-anything. There's no reason to allow i-bogon to be well-formed. > Cheating, zh-min-nan isn't really irregular, but together with > en-GB-oed and <sgn-legacy> it's the list of grandfathered tags > with three parts. Just so. The ABNF is syntactic, so I listed only the elements that do not match the "langtag" production. -- John Cowan cowan at ccil.org http://ccil.org/~cowan The present impossibility of giving a scientific explanation is no proof that there is no scientific explanation. The unexplained is not to be identified with the unexplainable, and the strange and extraordinary nature of a fact is not a justification for attributing it to powers above nature. --The Catholic Encyclopedia, s.v. "telepathy" (1913) _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.