> From: Jukka K. Korpela [mailto:jkorpela at cs.tut.fi] > Just to clarify: I did not mean an abstract utterance but something like > "The word [kala] 'fish' has probably remained the same from the Uralian > protolanguage to Finnish and Estonian but often changed considerably > in other Uralian languages." In that case, the transcription is of a reconstructed word form from proto Uralic -- it's a word in a specific (reconstructed) language. Now, mind you, ISO 639 does *not* provide IDs for historically-reconstructed proto-languages. Peter Constable _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru PA Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 00:09:56 -0700 Message-ID: <F8ACB1B494D9734783AAB114D0CE68FE0AFF857F at RED-MSG-52.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0609180941570.11817 at mustatilhi.cs.tut.fi> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [Ltru] Re: script tag for IPA Thread-Index: Acba7/qYrsgH8SF8Q7SSup13+hR0pgAAQYcQ From: Peter Constable <petercon at microsoft.com> To: <ltru at ietf.org> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Sep 2006 07:10:09.0417 (UTC) FILETIME=[79ECBF90:01C6DAF1] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 856eb5f76e7a34990d1d457d8e8e5b7f X-BeenThere: ltru at ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Language Tag Registry Update working group discussion list <ltru.ietf.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request at ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ltru> List-Post: <mailto:ltru at ietf.org> List-Help: <mailto:ltru-request at ietf.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru>, <mailto:ltru-request at ietf.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: ltru-bounces at ietf.org > From: Jukka K. Korpela [mailto:jkorpela at cs.tut.fi] > Just to clarify: I did not mean an abstract utterance but something like > "The word [kala] 'fish' has probably remained the same from the Uralian > protolanguage to Finnish and Estonian but often changed considerably > in other Uralian languages." In that case, the transcription is of a reconstructed word form from proto Uralic -- it's a word in a specific (reconstructed) language. Now, mind you, ISO 639 does *not* provide IDs for historically-reconstructed proto-languages. Peter Constable _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.