Hello Stephane, I have explicitly not said that the discussion of an alternative XML format should be moved off the list, because I, too, think that it is valuable to have such discussions. I have just asked that they be marked with [OT] to help people who are overwhelmed by the number of mails. Regards, Martin. At 16:44 06/09/18, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: >On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 11:17:38AM +0900, > Martin Duerst <duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp> wrote > a message of 127 lines which said: > >> As a co-chair, I marked this off-topic, unless I misunderstood you >> to make this as a proposal for the actual registry. > >I do not think that Frank wanted XML to be the official format :-) > >Nevertheless, I find quite useful, even if it is officially OT, to >discuss here about alternative formats (my proposal to host somewhere, >in an unofficial site, the translations to other formats) or about >implementations (such as Mark's regexp). > >Yes, it is not in the WG charter but tackling practical problems is >also a good way to test the standard and to improve it. > >If the chairs insist :-) may be we could create a dedicated mailing >list, "ltru-implementors" but I would regard this as useless >duplication. #-#-# Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University #-#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst at it.aoyama.ac.jp _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.