Stephane Bortzmeyer scripsit:
> xE-Lxs-qu is indicated as well-formed but I do not think so. Because
> of "Lxs", it can only be and extension and therefore, "qu" is
> forbidden (xE-Lxs is well-formed, as well as xE-Lxs-quT).
No, it's well-formed all right: language-extlang-region. Nothing
wrong with that, as in "zh-hak-TW", the variety of Hakka Chinese
spoken on Taiwan. Of course it won't be valid until 4646bis.
--
What asininity could I have uttered John Cowan <cowan at ccil.org>
that they applaud me thus? http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
--Phocion, Greek orator
_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.