Martin Duerst wrote: > i-hak -> zh-hakka > zh-hakka -> zh-hak > I think the following would be preferable: > i-hak -> zh-hak > zh-hakka -> zh-hak Yes. It would also eliminate the only pointer containing a "non-variant". We discussed this in the last round, I don't recall the arguments against it. Maybe the more convoluted 4646 pointers were inspired by UnicodeData.txt (?) > This would avoid the need for repetition when calculating > the preferred value. It also simplifies pointer checks, there's never a danger of A -> B -> C -> A, if A *_must_* point to something that has no further pointer. Frank _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.