David Conrad wrote: > Part of this project will also be to generate "legacy" > registries from the XML in formats that are as close to what > exists now as we can easily manage (in an undoubtedly > vain attempt to try to limit the screams of outrage from the > poor souls who have hacked software to deal with the existing > registries). That's rather important, e.g. it's not yet mentioned in a new <draft-narten-iana-considerations-rfc2434bis> submitted five days ago. I saw no discussion about it on the XML-dir list. It can affect any charset registry cleanup attempts (and Ira's tool donated to IANA), and of course it's also interesting for any modifications of the language subtag registry format. With Stephane's tip "Apricot" and Google I found a note from you in March about "eIANA", that sounded perfectly harmless, new Web site, new forms, faster, better, enjoy. Google didn't find what you said in January, but apparently half of the IAB should have known that that's coming, and not a minor issue. Maybe they ignored it at this time because it was before the renewal or SLA or whatever it was (IANAL), but forgetting it was "sub-optimal" (I hope that word has the same connotations in English as in German). Thanks for info Frank _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.