Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > Most of the RFCs which instruct IANA to create a registry > leave the details completely open and, unlike RFC 4646, > never specify a format for the registry. The _intended_ format of RFC 3864 is apparently like what you find in RFC 4021, the published registry in... http://www.iana.org/assignments/message-headers/perm-headers.html ...is rather minimalistic. > IMHO, it means IANA is quite free to change the master format For stuff that's in essence a collection of <name> ":" <value> fields in registration templates (= a "record" of record-jar) XML is not the ideal choice. Admittedly for the few registries I care about XML would be better than the status quo. Minus LTRU, that's fine. Frank _______________________________________________ Ltru mailing list Ltru at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.