[Ltru] Re: Proposal: include new "Language-Type:" field

["Doug Ewell" <dewell at adelphia.net>]

Is there any sort of consensus for or against John Cowan's proposal to 
add a "Language-Type" field that captures the ISO 639-3 classifications 
(extinct, historic, etc.)?

I've added this data to the Registry contents in draft-4645bis-01, and 
I'm writing text that explains the exact process for populating these 
fields; this can easily be removed if the WG ends up rejecting the 
proposal.  But since I'm getting ready to release draft-01, I'd like to 
know which way the wind is blowing on this.

--
Doug Ewell  *  Fullerton, California, USA  *  RFC 4645  *  UTN #14
http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/
http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages


_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru