[Ltru] Re: Is 639-3 bogus ?

["Doug Ewell" <dewell at adelphia.net>]

Peter Constable <petercon at microsoft dot com> wrote:

> IMO, there's no particular reason for members of this WG to be second 
> guessing whether the content of ISO 639-3 is good enough for use in 
> the LSR.

+1

I would add that asking, rhetorically or otherwise, whether 639-3 is 
bogus because it contains Orcish is akin to asking whether 639-2 is 
bogus because it encodes Klingon, or 15924 because it encodes Tengwar, 
or 3166-1 because it encodes Bouvet Island.  It takes a lot more than 
one or two questionable entries to make an entire standard bogus.

--
Doug Ewell  *  Fullerton, California, USA  *  RFC 4645  *  UTN #14
http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/
http://www1.ietf.org/html.charters/ltru-charter.html
http://www.alvestrand.no/mailman/listinfo/ietf-languages


_______________________________________________
Ltru mailing list
Ltru at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ltru